Contents
Anticipation
 

1. Presupposition on Natural Language
2. Sayama Assumption on Language  

FAQ

Read more: https://srfl-lab.webnode.com/products/what-problems-are-there-on-language-universals/


......................................................................................................


Text 1
 

Read more: https://srfl-paper.webnode.com/news/presupposition-on-natural-language/


....................................................................................................


Text 2
 

Read more: https://srfl-paper.webnode.com/news/sayama-assumption-on-language/

......................................................................................................


Text 3
 

TANAKA Akio

     

On Structure​

For HORI Tatsuo, Footprints on the snow, 1946​

​

​

Why do you think that language has structure?​

_We have true-false problem since Greece had logic on language, Crete man tells himself 

a liar. The situation suggests that if language has structure and we see the structure's 

whole, there is no more problem in the upper funny but radical story.​

​

Do you mention that language has dimensions in it for preventing the confusion?​

_Surely dimension is an important factor of structure. But language is a vast building in 

which all the logisc and all the feelings are expressible for all the hope of human beings.​

​

Then how the structure is built, do you imagine?​

_I ever learned the history of Prague Linguistic Circle, in which the most important 

hypothesis is said that language has function. Function is inevitably occurred following after 

the completion of structure, I think.​

​

Do you say that from the observation of language function is adequately acceptable for 

structure's surface?​

_Yes, I think so.​

​

Then on inner structure of language, what do you think?​

_At first, language has meaning. But it was put aside by Prague Linguistic Circle as the 

hardest problem on language for its ambiguity as MATHESIUS V. gave the famous lecture, 

Latency of　language phenomena, 1911.  I attracted the theme, language has ambiguity.​

​

Did you go to Prague? ​

_No. I only heard on PLC from CHINO Eiichi. He learned linguistics at Prague, from 1958 

to 1967. He gave me the basis of linguistics after his returning to Tokyo. I first met him at 

Tokyo 1969. I learned Russian at that time in the small class. He was young at 37, and I 

also young too at 21.   ​

​

You really respect CHINO.​

_I remember him respectfully, but more frequently merrily, for his fantastic conversation to 

the younger beginner, studying language from various fields, from art to classical languages 

at the university. ​

​

On language, ambiguity is important?​

_Undoubtedly. CHINO gave me the concept of asymmetric dualism of linguistic sign. The 

paper was written by KARCEVSKIJ Sergej at 1929. Precisely to say, "Du dualisme 

asymétrique du signe linguistique", Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 1.​

​

From ambiguity to structure, through what course did you choose?​

_I took the road from the minimum unit of meaning that was extracted by WANG 

Guowei's GUANTANG JILIN, the book was real youth of my life, for which I named 

 by reference of JAKOBSON Roman's concept . 

I dearly remember CHINO's warm advice "not to enter such a theme that are firstly treated 

by WITTGENSTEIN-like person. We are not invited", backing to the railway station from 

the university, after his lecture on linguistics at early summer twilight. ​

​

 is your starting point, I recognized. After that, To where did you go?​

_At first, from set theory. I ever learned it mainly from TAKEUCHI Gaishi's papers. Now I 

yet like his approch to the mathematical object. And I, at that time, also came under the 

influence of LÉVI-STRAUSS Claude.​

​

That course was productive to you?​

_It is a difficult question. For first step of my study, partly yes and mostly no.​

​

Mostly no, for what?​

_For me the most important is the relation between s. But set theory 

is not efficient for that direction.​

​

Is relation important?​

_Perhaps yes.​

​

Why?​

_Back to MATHESIUS's  or KARCEVSKIJ's , there exists 

relationship between one meaning and another meaning. For me, this relationship is not 

able to be handled by my set theory's level. But set theory is enough charming for its 

elemental simplicity.​

​

And where did you go to the next?​

_ Geometry. It is the most natural and fantastic approach by its freely intuitive methods. ​

​

Intuition is surely familiar. But selection is only done by such reason?​

_I have not any other choices at considering my mathematical level then.​

​

Geometry was respondent to your hope?​

_Yes, absolutely yes. As people say that geometry is a heimat of mathematics, I really 

think so.​

​

Geometry is more easily way to approach for you?​

_Repeatedly say, I have not any choices at that time. Meeting with geometry, I often wrote 

various figures containing topological ones, for instance at on the train to the town in which 

mother is under medical care.​

​

Such drawings can express language's validity?​

_Much interesting to express but the themes containing validity of language and so forth are 

very hard to access.​

​

Why?​

_Relationship among language inside is far away beyond my amateurishly imaginary 

figures.​

​

And after that?​

_I came here, at my present mathematical situation as PENROSE Roger said in his book THE 

ROAD TO REALITY, that mathematics is the most highly investigational way for the study of 

universe. His confidence to mathematics is put up on my home page of sekinan.org.​

​

Where do you stand now?​

_Symplectic geometry.​

​

Why do you stand there?​

_Also natural for me. And freely thinkable.​

​

Freely thinkable, what imagine by that?​

_Mathematics is radically free. Just like a wind at high lands, far-sighted and transparent.​

​

Mmm. Transparent. ​

_Yes,perfectly transparent. In contrast with language. Language is always having ambiguity.​

​

Ambiguous language and transparent mathematics.​

_That's all.​

​

Many thanks today.​

_It's my pleasure. ​

​

 

Read more: https://srfl-theory.webnode.com/news/why-do-you-think-that-language-has-structure/


.....................................................................................................


Text 4
 

Where is the change's power or energy?

 

TANAKA Akio

 

I was born in 1947 and become 68 years old this summer.
My unripeness to language study has come to the declining years.
Return to physics or mathematics is almost alike to back to youth age, when almost every day solving rudimentary problems for entire interest to unknown world.

In my mind there still are some hard themes to challenge, one of which is energy in language. The theme is originated from Edward Sapir, who presented the concept "drift" in Language, 1921. 
It was the macro and intuitive concept that was supposed by his precise thinking and vast field work of America native's language. I think that I would develop the theme from the physics-mathematics field.

In the garden

Peony begins to come out in the cold winter.

 

If there be change in language, from which to which language changes in its true nature?

At where is there the change's power or energy?

 

Refer to the next.

 

0. General survey

1. 5W1H in 2014 / 31 December 2014

1. Substantiality and time

1. Substantiality, Dedicated to SAPIR Edward / 27 February 2005 
2. Macro time and Micro Time / 24 July 2013

2.Flow and energy 

1. Flow of Language / Heritage of WANG Guowei and Edward Sapir / 26 September 2014
2. The days when I was thinking on Energy Distance Theory / 19 December 2014

4. Stochastic theory, distance, functional, potential with energy

1. Energy of Language / Stochastic Meaning Theory 4 / 24 July 2008
2. Energy and Distance / Energy Distance Theory / 31 August 2008
3. Energy and Functional / Energy Distance Theory /18 October 2008 
4. Potential of Language / Floer Homology Language / 2009

Tokyo
1 January 2015
SILNote

Read more: https://srfl-theory.webnode.com/news/where-is-the-changes-power-or-energy/


..............................................................................................................

Text 5
 

Why is boundary necessary in language?

q.v. Boundary of Words ​/ 12 February 2009

TANAKA Akio

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1.
I have thought of language as a physic existence that has inevitably boundary to the outer world.
My question is simple and primitive. I ever wrote about the change of language - If there be change, there are exactly the situations before change and after change. Just where does changing substance exist? In the essay, rotten apple was used as the symbol of changing language.

.............................................................................................................................................



Presupposition on Natural Language

TANAKA Akio
                                  
1.
Language is variable. If it be true, what is the base of variability?
2.
Language is pronounceable. If it be true, what is emerged by pronounced?
3.
Language is recordable. If it be true, what is emerged by recorded?
4.
Example.
An apple is variable and will be rotten by time proceeding.
An apple is pronounced at a glossary shop and will be bought by a home-maker.
An apple is recordable  and will be recorded in a photo.
5.
What distinguishes language from apple? The answer is uncertain. So I make the language models parting from natural language.

Reference
For WITTGENSTEIN Ludwig / Position of Language / 10 December 2005-3 August 2012

                                                              Tokyo
                                                       22 August 2012
                                       Sekinan Research Field of Language　

.............................................................................................................................................

2.
Language&s substantiality has been considered since I returned to the mathematical approach for learn language universals from the utterly beginning. In 2005 I wrote a tiny trial paper on the substantiality of language for thinking the study course hereafter.

...............................................................................................................................................


 

Substantiality

 

Dedicated to SAPIR Edward

 

TANAKA Akio

 

 

1 Substance of language is completion which possesses the distance from the real world.

2 The distance is sustained by the fixation for which meaning and time are abstracted.

3 If language has not distance, language appears and disappears following the real world proceeding.

4 Language is substantially unchangeable. Changeability occurs on surrounding.

5 The distance is measured by the longitude from the real world to the substantiality that meaning and time possess.

6 Substantiality is a frame of language.

7 Substantiality is free from the real world.

8 Substantiality is powered by outer energy.

9 Powered substantiality moves complied with possessed command, namely meaning and time.

10 Powered moving substantiality of language is called.

11 The idea of quantum is partially realized by in the supermarket or bookstore.

12 Substantiality is bar code of can or book. Outer energy is bar code reader. Quantum moves in a cash register. Language generates price addition in the real world.

13 Bar code is not language. Bar code is substantiality of language. Bar code does not move by itself. When bar code reader becomes energetic, bar code generates in a cash register. Language, namely, price-additional-work, starts at bookstore of station front in the bustling evening.    

 

 

Tokyo February 27, 2005

For the Memory of Tanashi Station Front Street February 26, 2005

Sekinan Research Field of Language

 

....................................................................................................................................

3.
In 2013, I again wrote on the substantiality of language at the new level containing the determinate essence of language, dimension and  time. The title is Macro Time and Micro Time. In this paper I thought that dimension is the essential factor of meaning, especially containing Infinitive meaning.

.......................................................................................................................................................
 

Macro Time and Micro Time

 

TANAKA Akio

24 July 2013
atbankofdam

1. 
Through natural language, in human being, occurred the electrical signal by eye or ear. These complex situations are beyond this paper’s limits.
2. 
Language is a physical object as signal and its transmission. At this circumstances, language must be recognised to be the existence that has finite time.
3. 
An apple on the desk gradually becomes rotten by passing the time very after the crop in the orchard. #0
4.
Like an apple, language has passing physical time in oneself.
5. 
Language is metamorphosed  by the time progressing.  #1
6. 
Language includes the outer world from human being to universe. At this declaration, I recall Blaise Pascal’s Pensées. XXXIII. PROOFS OF JESUS CHRIST 308 The infinite distance between body and mind symbolizes the infinitely more infinite distance between mind and charity, for charity is supernatural.(Translated by A.J. Krailsheimer, 1966) #2
7. 
Language’s time goes freely from the present to the future or the present to the past. #3
8. 
Language symbolises the time from finiteness to infinity. #4
9. 
Human being recognises this vast language world perfectly. #5

References
#0 For WITTGENSTEIN Ludwig Position of Language / December 10, 2005 – August 3, 2012 / Sekinan Research Field of Language
#1 Time of Word / Complex Manifold Deformation Theory / January 1, 2009 / sekinanlogos
#2 PASCAL PENSÉES. Translated with an introduction by A.J. Krailsheimer. PENGUIN BOOKS 1966.
#3 Escalator language and Time For SHINRAN’s Idea and BOHDISATTVA / Escalator Language Theory / December 16, 2006 / Sekinan Research Field of Language
#4 From Finiteness to Infinity on Language / Topological Group Theory / February 1, 2009 / sekinanlogos
#5 Understandability of Language / Complex Manifold Deformation Theory /January 9, 2009 / sekinanlogos

 

Source: https://atbankofdam.wiki.zoho.com/Macro-Time-and-Micro-Time.html/

To be continued.

 

......................................................................................................................................

 

4. 

Boundary is related with dimension through  Poincaré Theorem. Details are next.

 

.........................................................................................................................................

 

Dual Language

 

Duality of Language

 

TANAKA Akio

 

 

1. Theorem
(Poincaré duality)
For oriented compact n-dimension topological manifold M ,
bilinear form

is exact,
   and      become dual space each other.
♦ 

2. Interpretation
Word :=   M Boundary of language :=   p Dual language :=      and    Language :=   

3. Explanation
Word is compact and has dimension.
Language has dimension.
Language has boundary.
Boundary makes dual language.

 

4. References
Distance Theory
Mirror Theory
Guarantee of Language

Tokyo
25 May 2012
Sekinan Research Field of Language

 

...................................................................................................................................

5.
Relation between boundary and synthesis in language is utterly unknown field for me. Study has just started from the entrance position. Recent results are the next.

....................................................................................................................................

 

Synthesis Conjecture

Conjecture for synthesis of meaning in word 

TANAKA Akio 


Synthesis
1  Conjecture for synthesis of meaning in word
29/09/2013 19:25
For synthesis of meaning in word,  Conjecture: Condition for synthesis of meaning in word i s proposed by cohomological expression.

2  Conjecture: Condition for synthesis of meaning in word
29/09/2013 18:38
On condition for synthesis of meaning in word,  at conjecture is proposed  by the next result of etale cohomology.
Result
——————————————————-
Canonical natural equivalence
The next two are left exact additional functors.
F :  A   ->  A’  
G :  A’  ->  A” 
A  and  A’  have enough many injective objects.
If  F  transfers  A’  s injective object to  G  acyclic object, the next canonical natural equivalence is concluded.
R  (  G  O  F  ) =~  RG  O  RF .
——————————————————–
Conjecture
Preparation
Word is shown by  R . This word is called  old word .
Base meaning in word is shown by  F .
Word that has base meaning is shown by  RF .
Additional meaning to word is shown by  G .
Word that has additional meaning is shown by  RG . This word is called  intermediate word .
Word that has base meaning and additional meaning is shown by  R  (  G  O  F  ). This word is called  new word .
Conjecture
For completion of new word, old word and intermediate word have the condition shown by the canonical natural equivalence of etale cohomology.

3  Canonical natural equivalence
29/09/2013 18:08
Canonical natural equivalence
The next two are left exact additional functors.
F :  A   ->  A’  
G :  A’  ->  A” 
A  and  A’  have enough many injective objects.
If  F  transfers  A ‘s injective object to  G  acyclic object, the next canonical natural equivalence is concluded.
R  (  G  O  F  ) =~  RG  O  RF .

Source:  Conjecture for synthesis of meaning in word / sekinanlatest 2013 

Tokyo
1 May 2014
Sekinan Research Field of Language

 

.....................................................................................................................

6.
Three Conjectures containing Synthesis Conjecture are shown at the next.These conjectures are the latest result of language universals at SRFL Sekinan Research Field of Language.

1. Three Conjectures for Dimension, Synthesis and Reversion with Root and Supplement
2.  

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

Tokyo
21 December 2014
SIL

Read more: https://srfl-theory.webnode.com/news/why-is-boundary-necessary-in-language/

....................................................................................................


Text 6

 

How is the time alive in language?

Read more: https://srfl-theory.webnode.com/news/how-is-the-time-alive-in-language/


........................................................................................................................


Text 7

 

What facts do Three Conjectures for Dimension, Synthesis and Reversion show us?

Read more: https://srfl-theory.webnode.com/news/what-facts-do-three-conjectures-for-dimension-synthesis-and-reversion-show-us/


.........................................................................................................................


                                                                  Comment

Here ends the preparatory work for What is signal?, that began from 21 November 2018.
From now on this paper will be written at the viewpoint of  quantum group for the relation between quantum and signal-language, that has been the most important theme, quantum language, since 2003, when I wrote a paper titled, manuscript of Quantum Theory for Language.
Refer to the next.


 

Read more: https://srfl-lab.webnode.com/products/manuscript-of-quantum-theory-for-language-with-preface-note-and-note-2-2003-2018/


Here ends Manuscript of Quantum Theory for Language.


................................................................................................................................


Note 3


Manuscript of Quantum Theory for Language

Contents

Preface

1 Quantization of language
2 Appearance and disappearance of quantum
3 Conjugation and class of quantum
4 Encoding of quantum and assembled quanta
5 Progress and class of quantum groups
6 Basic principle of quantum theory

Note
Note 2
Note 3


Tokyo
13 Aprila 2019
ENSILA


....................................................................................................................................